Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Prevention of Chronic Conditions by Promoting Healthy Lifestyles

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  • Cancer
  • Diabetes
  • Heart Disease and Stroke
  • Nutrition and Healthy Eating
  • Physical Activity
  • Weight Status

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007613

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007613

23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007613 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007613 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007613 has a value of 23.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007614

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007614

26.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007614 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007614 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007614 has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007700

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007700

26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007700 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007700 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007700 has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007800

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007800

27.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007800 has a value of 27.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007800 has a value of 27.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007800 has a value of 27.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007901

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007901

26.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007901 has a value of 26.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007901 has a value of 26.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007901 has a value of 26.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007903

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007903

24.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007903 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007903 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007903 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007904

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007904

26.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007904 has a value of 26.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007904 has a value of 26.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007904 has a value of 26.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008001

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008001

27.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008001 has a value of 27.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008001 has a value of 27.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008001 has a value of 27.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008002

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008002

28.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008002 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008002 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008002 has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008004

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008004

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008004 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008004 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008004 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008005

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008005

27.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008005 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008005 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008005 has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008101

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008101

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008101 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008101 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008101 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008201

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008201

25.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008201 has a value of 25.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008201 has a value of 25.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008201 has a value of 25.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008202

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008202

27.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008202 has a value of 27.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008202 has a value of 27.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008202 has a value of 27.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008302

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008302

25.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008302 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008302 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008302 has a value of 25.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008303

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008303

24.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008303 has a value of 24.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008303 has a value of 24.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008303 has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008304

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008304

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008304 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008304 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008304 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008305

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008305

23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008305 has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008305 has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008305 has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008306

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008306

24.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008306 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008306 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008306 has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008401

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008401

26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008401 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008401 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008401 has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008402

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008402

26.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008402 has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008500

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008500

24.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of 24.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of 24.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008500 has a value of 24.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008600

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008600

32.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of 32.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of 32.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008600 has a value of 32.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008700

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008700

33.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of 33.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of 33.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008700 has a value of 33.0%.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008800

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008800

29.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of 29.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of 29.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008800 has a value of 29.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008900

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111008900

30.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of 30.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of 30.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111008900 has a value of 30.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111009100

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111009100

37.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of 37.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of 37.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111009100 has a value of 37.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111980000

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111980000

25.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111980000 has a value of 25.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111980000 has a value of 25.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111980000 has a value of 25.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Health / Weight Status

Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Ventura

Current Value:

Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Ventura

62.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 62.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (62.3%), Ventura has a value of 62.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.7%), Ventura has a value of 62.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (62.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (63.4%).
Prior Value
(63.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Weight Status

Children who are Overweight for Age

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Children who are Overweight for Age

Value
Compared to:

Children who are Overweight for Age County: Ventura

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age County: Ventura

12.9%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (14.9%), Ventura has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Camarillo

10.2%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), Camarillo has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Camarillo (10.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Fillmore

23.0%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), Fillmore has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Moorpark

12.2%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), Moorpark has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Moorpark (12.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.3%).
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Oxnard

15.9%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), Oxnard has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Oxnard (15.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

15.5%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), Port Hueneme has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Port Hueneme (15.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

13.0%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, San Buenaventura (Ventura) (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Santa Paula

17.2%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), Santa Paula has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Paula (17.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Simi Valley

11.3%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), Simi Valley has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Simi Valley (11.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

8.6%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Thousand Oaks (8.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 91320

8.6%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 91320 has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91320 (8.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.4%).
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 91360

9.6%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 91360 has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91360 (9.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 91361

5.5%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 91361 has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91361 (5.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 91362

8.0%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 91362 has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91362 (8.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93001

15.4%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93001 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93001 (15.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93003

12.1%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93003 has a value of 12.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93003 (12.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93004

11.3%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93004 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93004 (11.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.5%).
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93010

11.2%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93010 has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93010 (11.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93012

9.1%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93012 has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93012 (9.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93015

22.7%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93015 has a value of 22.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93021

11.7%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93021 has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93021 (11.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93030

17.6%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93030 has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93030 (17.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93033

13.8%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93033 has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93033 (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93035

16.2%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93035 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93035 (16.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93036

15.4%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93036 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93036 (15.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93041

15.1%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93041 has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93041 (15.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93060

17.8%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93060 has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93060 (17.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.5%).
Prior Value
(13.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93063

10.5%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93063 has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Children who are Overweight for Age Zip Code: 93065

11.4%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (12.9%), 93065 has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93065 (11.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Weight Status

Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese County: Ventura

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese County: Ventura

32.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (31.2%), Ventura has a value of 32.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (32.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (67.2%).
Prior Value
(67.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Camarillo

61.0%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), Camarillo has a value of 61.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Camarillo (61.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Moorpark

66.2%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), Moorpark has a value of 66.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Moorpark (66.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Oak Park

6.7%
(2011-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (13.8%), Oak Park has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Oxnard

46.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), Oxnard has a value of 46.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Oxnard (46.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (77.1%).
Prior Value
(77.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

43.4%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), Port Hueneme has a value of 43.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Port Hueneme (43.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.9%).
Prior Value
(40.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Port Hueneme value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

36.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 36.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, San Buenaventura (Ventura) (36.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (72.0%).
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Santa Paula

49.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), Santa Paula has a value of 49.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Paula (49.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.6%).
Prior Value
(17.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Simi Valley

61.7%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), Simi Valley has a value of 61.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, Simi Valley (61.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

9.4%
(2011-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (13.8%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 91362

21.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 91362 has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93001

38.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93001 has a value of 38.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93001 (38.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (72.5%).
Prior Value
(72.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93003

35.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93003 has a value of 35.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93003 (35.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (68.3%).
Prior Value
(68.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93004

32.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93004 has a value of 32.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93004 (32.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (70.8%).
Prior Value
(70.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93010

63.9%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), 93010 has a value of 63.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93012

57.2%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), 93012 has a value of 57.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93015

83.0%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), 93015 has a value of 83.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93021

62.7%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), 93021 has a value of 62.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93023

63.2%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), 93023 has a value of 63.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93030

46.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93030 has a value of 46.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93033

48.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93033 has a value of 48.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93033 (48.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (76.1%).
Prior Value
(76.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93035

37.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93035 has a value of 37.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93036

43.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93036 has a value of 43.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93036 (43.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.0%).
Prior Value
(45.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93041

41.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93041 has a value of 41.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93041 (41.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.4%).
Prior Value
(40.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93060

45.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (32.5%), 93060 has a value of 45.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93060 (45.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.2%).
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Teens who are Overweight or Obese Zip Code: 93065

60.5%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (67.2%), 93065 has a value of 60.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.