Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Prevention of Chronic Conditions by Promoting Healthy Lifestyles

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  • Cancer
  • Diabetes
  • Heart Disease and Stroke
  • Nutrition and Healthy Eating
  • Physical Activity
  • Weight Status

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93060

33.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93060 has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93060 (33.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.9%).
Prior Value
(28.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93060 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93063

22.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93063 has a value of 22.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93063 (22.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93063 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93064

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93064

18.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93064 has a value of 18.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93064 (18.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.9%).
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has  been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93065

21.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93065 has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93065 (21.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93065 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has  been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93066

25.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93066 has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93066 (25.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.7%).
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000100

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000100

27.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000200

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000200

32.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000302

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000302

30.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 30.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 30.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000302 has a value of 30.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000303

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000303

28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000303 has a value of 28.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000304

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000304

30.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 30.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 30.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000304 has a value of 30.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000400

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000400

30.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 30.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 30.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000400 has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000500

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000500

30.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 30.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 30.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000500 has a value of 30.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000600

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000600

33.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 33.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000600 has a value of 33.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000701

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000701

32.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 32.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000701 has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000702

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000702

30.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 30.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 30.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000702 has a value of 30.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000800

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000800

28.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 28.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 28.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000800 has a value of 28.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000901

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000901

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000901 has a value of 23.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000902

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000902

26.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000902 has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000903

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000903

25.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000903 has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001001

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001001

27.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001002

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001002

27.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001002 has a value of 27.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001101

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001101

26.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 26.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 26.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001101 has a value of 26.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001102

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001102

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001102 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001201

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001201

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001201 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001202

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001202

25.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001202 has a value of 25.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001204

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001204

29.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 29.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 29.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001204 has a value of 29.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001206

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001206

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001301

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001301

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001302

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001302

31.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 31.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001302 has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001401

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001401

24.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001401 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001402

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001402

26.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001402 has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001502

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001502

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001503

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001503

28.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001506

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001506

26.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 26.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 26.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001506 has a value of 26.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001507

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001507

27.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001507 has a value of 27.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001601

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001601

27.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001602

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001602

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001602 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001700

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001700

23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001800

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001800

23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001900

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001900

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002000

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002000

24.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002000 has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002102

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002102

26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002102 has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002200

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002200

31.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 31.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 31.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002200 has a value of 31.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002300

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002300

30.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002400

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002400

31.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 31.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002400 has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002500

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002500

24.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002500 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002600

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002600

26.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 26.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 26.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002600 has a value of 26.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002700

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002700

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002700 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002800

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002800

27.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002800 has a value of 27.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002901

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002901

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002901 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002905

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002905

25.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002905 has a value of 25.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003010

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003010

28.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003010 has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003011

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003011

31.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 31.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003011 has a value of 31.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003012

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003012

41.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003013

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003013

27.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003013 has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003100

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003100

25.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003201

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003201

34.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 34.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 34.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003201 has a value of 34.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003300

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003300

31.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003605

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003605

26.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003608

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003608

28.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003608 has a value of 28.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003609

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003609

25.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003612

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003612

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003700

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003700

33.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003700 has a value of 33.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003700 has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003700 has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003801

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003801

34.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003801 has a value of 34.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003801 has a value of 34.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003801 has a value of 34.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003802

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003802

31.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003802 has a value of 31.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003802 has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003802 has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003900

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003900

31.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004000

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004000

31.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004000 has a value of 31.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004000 has a value of 31.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004000 has a value of 31.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004101

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004101

30.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004101 has a value of 30.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004101 has a value of 30.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004101 has a value of 30.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004200

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004200

29.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004200 has a value of 29.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004200 has a value of 29.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004200 has a value of 29.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004304

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004304

27.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004304 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004304 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004304 has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004305

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004305

23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004305 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004305 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004305 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004400

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004400

30.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004400 has a value of 30.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004400 has a value of 30.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004400 has a value of 30.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004503

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004503

32.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004503 has a value of 32.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004503 has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004503 has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004504

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004504

29.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004504 has a value of 29.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004504 has a value of 29.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004504 has a value of 29.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004505

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004505

30.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004505 has a value of 30.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004505 has a value of 30.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004505 has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004506

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004506

35.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004600

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004600

27.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004600 has a value of 27.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004600 has a value of 27.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004600 has a value of 27.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004704

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004704

32.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004704 has a value of 32.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004704 has a value of 32.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004704 has a value of 32.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004710

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004710

29.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004710 has a value of 29.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004710 has a value of 29.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004710 has a value of 29.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004711

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004711

24.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004711 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004711 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004711 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004715

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004715

30.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004715 has a value of 30.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004715 has a value of 30.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004715 has a value of 30.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004716

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004716

28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004716 has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004716 has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004716 has a value of 28.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004717

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004717

32.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004901

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004901

25.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004901 has a value of 25.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004901 has a value of 25.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004901 has a value of 25.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004902

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004902

32.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004902 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004902 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004902 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005002

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005002

33.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005002 has a value of 33.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005002 has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005002 has a value of 33.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005003

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005003

31.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005004

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005004

26.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005004 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005004 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005004 has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005100

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005100

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005202

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005202

24.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005202 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005202 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005202 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005203

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005203

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005203 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005204

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005204

23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005204 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005204 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005204 has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005205

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005205

23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005205 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005205 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005205 has a value of 23.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005303

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005303

23.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005304

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005304

21.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005304 has a value of 21.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005304 has a value of 21.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005304 has a value of 21.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has  been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005305

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005305

23.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005305 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005305 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005305 has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005306

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005306

23.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005306 has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005306 has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005306 has a value of 23.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005401

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005401

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005401 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005401 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005401 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005403

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005403

26.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005403 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005403 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005403 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005404

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005404

27.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005404 has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005404 has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005404 has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005502

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005502

25.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005502 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005502 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005502 has a value of 25.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005503

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005503

26.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005503 has a value of 26.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005503 has a value of 26.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005503 has a value of 26.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005504

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005504

24.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005504 has a value of 24.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005504 has a value of 24.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005504 has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005600

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005600

25.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005600 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005600 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005600 has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005700

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005700

21.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005700 has a value of 21.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005700 has a value of 21.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005700 has a value of 21.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has  been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005801

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005801

23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005801 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005801 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005801 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005802

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005802

24.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005802 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005802 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005802 has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005901

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005901

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005901 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005901 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005901 has a value of 23.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005906

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005906

23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005906 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005906 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005906 has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005907

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005907

22.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005907 has a value of 22.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005907 has a value of 22.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005907 has a value of 22.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005908

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005908

24.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005908 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005908 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005908 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005909

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005909

25.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005909 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005909 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005909 has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005910

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005910

24.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005910 has a value of 24.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005910 has a value of 24.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005910 has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005911

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005911

23.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005911 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005911 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005911 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006000

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006000

24.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006000 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006000 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006000 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006100

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006100

25.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006100 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006100 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006100 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006200

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006200

23.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006200 has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006200 has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006200 has a value of 23.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006301

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006301

22.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006301 has a value of 22.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006301 has a value of 22.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006301 has a value of 22.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006302

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006302

20.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006302 has a value of 20.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006302 has a value of 20.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006302 has a value of 20.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has  been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006400

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006400

25.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006400 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006400 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006400 has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006500

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006500

28.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006500 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006500 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006500 has a value of 28.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006600

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006600

25.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006600 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006600 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006600 has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006700

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006700

24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006700 has a value of 24.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006700 has a value of 24.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006700 has a value of 24.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006800

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006800

27.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006800 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006800 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006800 has a value of 27.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006900

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006900

25.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006900 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006900 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006900 has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007000

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007000

26.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007000 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007000 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007000 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007100

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007100

27.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007100 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007100 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007100 has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007201

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007201

24.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007201 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007201 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007201 has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007202

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007202

23.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007202 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007300

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007300

24.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007300 has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007402

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007402

23.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007402 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007403

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007403

22.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007403 has a value of 22.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007405

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007405

23.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007405 has a value of 23.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007406

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007406

23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007406 has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007505

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007505

25.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007505 has a value of 25.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007506

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007506

25.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007506 has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007507

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007507

23.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007507 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007508

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007508

24.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007508 has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007509

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007509

23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007509 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007510

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007510

22.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 22.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 22.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007510 has a value of 22.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007511

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007511

24.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 24.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 24.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007511 has a value of 24.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007512

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007512

25.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007512 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007513

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007513

24.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007513 has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007514

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007514

24.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007514 has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007606

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007606

23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007606 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007607

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007607

23.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007607 has a value of 23.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007609

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007609

24.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007609 has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007610

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007610

24.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007610 has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007611

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007611

29.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 29.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 29.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007611 has a value of 29.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007612

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007612

25.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 25.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 25.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007612 has a value of 25.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)