Prevention of Chronic Conditions by Promoting Healthy Lifestyles
- Cancer
- Diabetes
- Heart Disease and Stroke
- Nutrition and Healthy Eating
- Physical Activity
- Weight Status
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Health / Weight Status
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93060
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93060
![Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93060 has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, 93060 (33.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the 93060 value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93063
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93063
![Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93063 has a value of 22.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, 93063 (22.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the 93063 value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93064
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93064
![Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93064 has a value of 18.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, 93064 (18.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93065
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93065
![Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93065 has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, 93065 (21.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the 93065 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93066
Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93066
![Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93066 has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, 93066 (25.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000100
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000100
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000200
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000200
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000302
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000302
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 30.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 30.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000302 has a value of 30.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000303
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000303
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000303 has a value of 28.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000304
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000304
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 30.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 30.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000304 has a value of 30.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000400
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000400
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 30.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 30.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000400 has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000500
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000500
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 30.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 30.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000500 has a value of 30.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000600
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000600
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 33.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000600 has a value of 33.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000701
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000701
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 32.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000701 has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000702
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000702
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 30.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 30.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000702 has a value of 30.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000800
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000800
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 28.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 28.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000800 has a value of 28.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000901
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000901
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000901 has a value of 23.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000902
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000902
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000902 has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000903
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000903
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000903 has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001001
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001001
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001002
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001002
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001002 has a value of 27.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001101
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001101
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 26.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 26.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001101 has a value of 26.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001102
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001102
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001102 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001201
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001201
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001201 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001202
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001202
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001202 has a value of 25.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001204
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001204
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 29.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 29.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001204 has a value of 29.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001206
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001206
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001301
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001301
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001302
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001302
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 31.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001302 has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001401
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001401
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001401 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001402
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001402
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001402 has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001502
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001502
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001503
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001503
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001506
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001506
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 26.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 26.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001506 has a value of 26.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001507
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001507
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001507 has a value of 27.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001601
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001601
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001602
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001602
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001602 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001700
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001700
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001800
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001800
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001900
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001900
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002000
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002000
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002000 has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002102
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002102
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002102 has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002200
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002200
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 31.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 31.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002200 has a value of 31.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002300
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002300
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002400
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002400
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 31.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002400 has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002500
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002500
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002500 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002600
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002600
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 26.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 26.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002600 has a value of 26.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002700
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002700
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002700 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002800
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002800
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002800 has a value of 27.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002901
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002901
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002901 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002905
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002905
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002905 has a value of 25.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003010
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003010
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003010 has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003011
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003011
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 31.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003011 has a value of 31.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003012
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003012
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003013
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003013
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003013 has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003100
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003100
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003201
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003201
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 34.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 34.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003201 has a value of 34.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003300
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003300
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003605
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003605
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003608
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003608
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003608 has a value of 28.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003609
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003609
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003612
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003612
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003700
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003700
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003700 has a value of 33.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003700 has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003700 has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003801
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003801
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003801 has a value of 34.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003801 has a value of 34.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003801 has a value of 34.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003802
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003802
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003802 has a value of 31.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003802 has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003802 has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003900
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003900
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004000
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004000
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004000 has a value of 31.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004000 has a value of 31.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004000 has a value of 31.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004101
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004101
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004101 has a value of 30.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004101 has a value of 30.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004101 has a value of 30.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004200
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004200
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004200 has a value of 29.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004200 has a value of 29.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004200 has a value of 29.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004304
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004304
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004304 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004304 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004304 has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004305
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004305
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004305 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004305 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004305 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004400
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004400
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004400 has a value of 30.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004400 has a value of 30.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004400 has a value of 30.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004503
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004503
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004503 has a value of 32.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004503 has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004503 has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004504
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004504
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004504 has a value of 29.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004504 has a value of 29.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004504 has a value of 29.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004505
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004505
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004505 has a value of 30.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004505 has a value of 30.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004505 has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004506
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004506
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004600
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004600
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004600 has a value of 27.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004600 has a value of 27.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004600 has a value of 27.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004704
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004704
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004704 has a value of 32.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004704 has a value of 32.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004704 has a value of 32.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004710
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004710
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004710 has a value of 29.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004710 has a value of 29.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004710 has a value of 29.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004711
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004711
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004711 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004711 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004711 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004715
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004715
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004715 has a value of 30.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004715 has a value of 30.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004715 has a value of 30.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004716
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004716
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004716 has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004716 has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004716 has a value of 28.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004717
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004717
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004901
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004901
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004901 has a value of 25.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004901 has a value of 25.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004901 has a value of 25.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004902
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004902
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004902 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004902 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004902 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005002
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005002
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005002 has a value of 33.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005002 has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005002 has a value of 33.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005003
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005003
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005004
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005004
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005004 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005004 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005004 has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005100
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005100
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005202
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005202
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005202 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005202 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005202 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005203
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005203
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005203 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005204
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005204
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005204 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005204 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005204 has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005205
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005205
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005205 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005205 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005205 has a value of 23.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005303
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005303
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005304
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005304
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005304 has a value of 21.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005304 has a value of 21.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005304 has a value of 21.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005305
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005305
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005305 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005305 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005305 has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005306
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005306
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005306 has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005306 has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005306 has a value of 23.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005401
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005401
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005401 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005401 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005401 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005403
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005403
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005403 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005403 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005403 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005404
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005404
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005404 has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005404 has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005404 has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005502
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005502
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005502 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005502 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005502 has a value of 25.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005503
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005503
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005503 has a value of 26.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005503 has a value of 26.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005503 has a value of 26.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005504
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005504
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005504 has a value of 24.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005504 has a value of 24.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005504 has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005600
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005600
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005600 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005600 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005600 has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005700
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005700
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005700 has a value of 21.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005700 has a value of 21.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005700 has a value of 21.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005801
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005801
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005801 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005801 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005801 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005802
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005802
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005802 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005802 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005802 has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005901
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005901
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005901 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005901 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005901 has a value of 23.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005906
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005906
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005906 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005906 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005906 has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005907
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005907
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005907 has a value of 22.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005907 has a value of 22.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005907 has a value of 22.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005908
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005908
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005908 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005908 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005908 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005909
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005909
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005909 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005909 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005909 has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005910
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005910
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005910 has a value of 24.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005910 has a value of 24.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005910 has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005911
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005911
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005911 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005911 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005911 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006000
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006000
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006000 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006000 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006000 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006100
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006100
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006100 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006100 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006100 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006200
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006200
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006200 has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006200 has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006200 has a value of 23.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006301
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006301
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006301 has a value of 22.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006301 has a value of 22.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006301 has a value of 22.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006302
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006302
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006302 has a value of 20.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006302 has a value of 20.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006302 has a value of 20.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006400
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006400
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006400 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006400 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006400 has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006500
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006500
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006500 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006500 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006500 has a value of 28.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006600
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006600
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006600 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006600 has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006600 has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006700
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006700
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006700 has a value of 24.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006700 has a value of 24.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006700 has a value of 24.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006800
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006800
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006800 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006800 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006800 has a value of 27.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006900
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111006900
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006900 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006900 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111006900 has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007000
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007000
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007000 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007000 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007000 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007100
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007100
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007100 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007100 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007100 has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007201
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007201
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007201 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007201 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007201 has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007202
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007202
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007202 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007300
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007300
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007300 has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007402
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007402
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007402 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007403
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007403
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007403 has a value of 22.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007405
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007405
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007405 has a value of 23.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007406
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007406
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007406 has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007505
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007505
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007505 has a value of 25.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007506
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007506
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007506 has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007507
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007507
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 23.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007507 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007508
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007508
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007508 has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007509
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007509
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007509 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007510
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007510
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 22.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 22.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007510 has a value of 22.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007511
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007511
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 24.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 24.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007511 has a value of 24.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007512
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007512
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007512 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007513
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007513
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007513 has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007514
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007514
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007514 has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007606
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007606
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007606 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007607
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007607
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007607 has a value of 23.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007609
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007609
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007609 has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007610
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007610
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007610 has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007611
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007611
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 29.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 29.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007611 has a value of 29.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007612
Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111007612
![Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 25.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 25.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111007612 has a value of 25.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)