Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Addressing Mental Health and Substance Use Across the Lifespan

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  1. Adverse Childhood Experiences
    1. Substance Use
    2. Adolescent Health
    3. Education
    4. Housing Overcrowding
  2. Health and Wellness for Older Adults

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Value
Compared to:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008402

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008402

$3,697
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of $3,697 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111008402 has a value of $3,697 which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008402 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008500

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008500

$2,963
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of $2,963 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,223 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,726.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,283 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,567), 06111008500 has a value of $2,963 which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,567)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008501

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008501

$2,877
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008501 has a value of $2,877 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111008501 has a value of $2,877 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008502

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008502

$3,158
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008502 has a value of $3,158 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111008502 has a value of $3,158 which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008600

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008600

$2,020
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of $2,020 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,223 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,726.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,283 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,567), 06111008600 has a value of $2,020 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,567)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008601

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008601

$2,560
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008601 has a value of $2,560 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111008601 has a value of $2,560 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008602

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008602

$1,714
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008602 has a value of $1,714 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111008602 has a value of $1,714 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008700

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008700

$2,176
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of $2,176 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111008700 has a value of $2,176 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008800

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008800

$2,261
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of $2,261 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111008800 has a value of $2,261 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008900

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111008900

$2,673
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of $2,673 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111008900 has a value of $2,673 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008900 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009100

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009100

$1,626
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of $1,626 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111009100 has a value of $1,626 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111009100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009200

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009200

$2,486
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009200 has a value of $2,486 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111009200 has a value of $2,486 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009400

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009400

$2,841
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009400 has a value of $2,841 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111009400 has a value of $2,841 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009500

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009500

$2,902
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009500 has a value of $2,902 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111009500 has a value of $2,902 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009600

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009600

$3,747
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009600 has a value of $3,747 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111009600 has a value of $3,747 which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009700

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Tract: 06111009700

$2,044
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009700 has a value of $2,044 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,529 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,048.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,543 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value ($2,940), 06111009700 has a value of $2,044 which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
($2,940)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

Value
Compared to:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing County: Ventura

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing County: Ventura

38.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 38.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 38.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Ventura has a value of 38.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Ventura has a value of 38.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (38.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.6%).
Prior Value
(38.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): Camarillo

36.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Camarillo has a value of 36.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Camarillo has a value of 36.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (38.5%), Camarillo has a value of 36.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(38.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Camarillo has a value of 36.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Camarillo has a value of 36.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): Oxnard

36.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Oxnard has a value of 36.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Oxnard has a value of 36.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (38.5%), Oxnard has a value of 36.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(38.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Oxnard has a value of 36.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Oxnard has a value of 36.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

32.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 32.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 32.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (38.5%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(38.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): Simi Valley

37.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Simi Valley has a value of 37.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Simi Valley has a value of 37.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (38.5%), Simi Valley has a value of 37.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(38.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Simi Valley has a value of 37.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Simi Valley has a value of 37.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

40.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Thousand Oaks has a value of 40.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Thousand Oaks has a value of 40.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (38.5%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 40.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(38.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 40.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 40.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Economy / Housing & Homes

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Overcrowded Households County: Ventura

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households County: Ventura

6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 6.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Ventura has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Ventura has a value of 6.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ventura value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Camarillo

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Camarillo has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Camarillo has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Camarillo has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 2.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Casa Conejo has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Casa Conejo has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Casa Conejo has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

Current Value:
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 6.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 6.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 6.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): El Rio

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): El Rio

15.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, El Rio has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), El Rio has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), El Rio has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), El Rio has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Fillmore

10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 10.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Fillmore has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Fillmore has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Fillmore has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 3.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Mira Monte

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Mira Monte

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Mira Monte has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Mira Monte has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Mira Monte has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Moorpark

3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 3.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Moorpark has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Moorpark has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Moorpark has a value of 3.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Oak Park

2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Oak Park has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Oak Park has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Oak Park has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Oak View

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Oak View

3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak View has a value of 3.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Oak View has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Oak View has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Oak View has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Ojai

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Ojai

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ojai has a value of 5.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Ojai has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Ojai has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Ojai has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Oxnard

17.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Oxnard has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Oxnard has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Oxnard has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Piru

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Piru

4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Piru has a value of 4.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Piru has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Piru has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Piru has a value of 4.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 10.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Port Hueneme has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Port Hueneme has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Port Hueneme has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 4.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Santa Paula

13.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 13.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

Current Value:
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Santa Susana

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Santa Susana

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Santa Susana has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Santa Susana has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Santa Susana has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Saticoy

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Saticoy

25.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 25.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Saticoy has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Saticoy has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Saticoy has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Simi Valley

3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Simi Valley has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Simi Valley has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Simi Valley has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91320

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 91320 has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91320 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91360

2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 91360 has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91360 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91361

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 1.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 91361 has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91361 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91362

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 2.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 91362 has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91362 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 91377

2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 91377 has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91377 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93001

5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 5.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93001 has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93001 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93003

3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93003 has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93003 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93004

4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93004 has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93004 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93010

2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 2.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93010 has a value of 2.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93010 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93012

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 1.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93012 has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93012 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93015

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93015 has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93015 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93021

3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93021 has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93021 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93022

4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93022 has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93022 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93023

3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93023 has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93023 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93030

15.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 15.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93030 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93030 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93033

29.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 29.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93033 has a value of 29.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93033 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93035

5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 5.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93035 has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93035 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93036

10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 10.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93036 has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93036 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93040

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93040

5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 5.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93040 has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93040 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93041

9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93041 has a value of 9.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93041 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93043

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93043

100.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,714 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.2%), 93043 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93043 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93060

12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 12.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93060 has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93060 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93063

3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93063 has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93063 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93065

3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93065 has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93065 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 93066

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 5.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (6.5%), 93066 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93066 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Ventura

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Ventura

59.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 59.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 59.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Ventura has a value of 59.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Ventura has a value of 59.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Bell Canyon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bell Canyon value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Camarillo

64.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 64.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 64.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Camarillo has a value of 64.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Camarillo has a value of 64.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Camarillo has a value of 64.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Camarillo value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 60.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Casa Conejo has a value of 60.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Casa Conejo has a value of 60.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Casa Conejo has a value of 60.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Casa Conejo value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

87.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 87.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 87.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 87.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 87.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 87.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Channel Islands Beach value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): El Rio

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): El Rio

52.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, El Rio has a value of 52.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, El Rio has a value of 52.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), El Rio has a value of 52.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), El Rio has a value of 52.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), El Rio has a value of 52.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the El Rio value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Fillmore

64.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 64.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 64.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Fillmore has a value of 64.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Fillmore has a value of 64.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Fillmore has a value of 64.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fillmore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

82.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 82.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 82.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 82.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 82.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 82.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake Sherwood value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

44.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 44.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 44.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 44.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 44.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 44.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Meiners Oaks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Mira Monte

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Mira Monte

66.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 66.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 66.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Mira Monte has a value of 66.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Mira Monte has a value of 66.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Mira Monte has a value of 66.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mira Monte value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Moorpark

56.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 56.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 56.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Moorpark has a value of 56.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Moorpark has a value of 56.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Moorpark has a value of 56.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Moorpark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Oak Park

52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 52.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 52.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Oak Park has a value of 52.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Oak Park has a value of 52.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Oak Park has a value of 52.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oak Park value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Oak View

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Oak View

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak View has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak View has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Oak View has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Oak View has a value of 55.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Oak View has a value of 55.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oak View value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Ojai

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Ojai

74.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ojai has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ojai has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Ojai has a value of 74.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Ojai has a value of 74.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Ojai has a value of 74.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ojai value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Oxnard

58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 58.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 58.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Oxnard has a value of 58.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Oxnard has a value of 58.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Oxnard has a value of 58.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oxnard value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Piru

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Piru

57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Piru has a value of 57.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Piru has a value of 57.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Piru has a value of 57.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Piru has a value of 57.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Piru has a value of 57.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Piru value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

60.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 60.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 60.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Port Hueneme has a value of 60.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Port Hueneme has a value of 60.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Port Hueneme has a value of 60.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Port Hueneme value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

57.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 57.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 57.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 57.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 57.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 57.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Buenaventura (Ventura) value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Santa Paula

59.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 59.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 59.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Santa Paula has a value of 59.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Santa Paula has a value of 59.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Santa Paula has a value of 59.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Paula value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

55.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 55.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 55.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 55.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 55.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 55.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Rosa Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Santa Susana

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Santa Susana

52.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 52.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 52.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Santa Susana has a value of 52.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Santa Susana has a value of 52.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Santa Susana has a value of 52.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Susana value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Saticoy

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Saticoy

38.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 38.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 38.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Saticoy has a value of 38.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Saticoy has a value of 38.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Saticoy has a value of 38.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Saticoy value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Simi Valley

64.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Simi Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

56.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Thousand Oaks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91320

55.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 55.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 55.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91320 has a value of 55.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91320 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91360

57.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 57.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 57.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91360 has a value of 57.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91360 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91361

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91361 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91361 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91362

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91362 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91362 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91377

52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 52.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 52.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91377 has a value of 52.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91377 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93001

56.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 56.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93001 has a value of 56.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93001 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93003

60.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 60.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 60.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93003 has a value of 60.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93003 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93004

51.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 51.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 51.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93004 has a value of 51.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93004 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93010

64.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 64.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 64.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93010 has a value of 64.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93010 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93012

62.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 62.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 62.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93012 has a value of 62.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93012 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93015

60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93015 has a value of 60.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93015 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93021

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93021 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93021 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93022

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93022 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93022 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93023

62.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 62.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 62.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93023 has a value of 62.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93023 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93030

54.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 54.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 54.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93030 has a value of 54.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93030 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93033

60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93033 has a value of 60.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93033 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93035

61.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 61.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 61.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93035 has a value of 61.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93035 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93036

62.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 62.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 62.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93036 has a value of 62.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93036 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93040

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93040

46.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 46.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 46.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93040 has a value of 46.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93040 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93041

63.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 63.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 63.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93041 has a value of 63.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93041 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93043

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93043

100.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,641 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,137 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (58.8%), 93043 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(58.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93043 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93060

58.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 58.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 58.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93060 has a value of 58.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93060 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93063

57.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 57.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 57.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93063 has a value of 57.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93063 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93065

69.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93065 has a value of 69.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93065 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93066

57.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 57.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 57.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93066 has a value of 57.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93066 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000100

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000100

60.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 60.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 60.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111000100 has a value of 60.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000200

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000200

56.9%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 56.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 56.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111000200 has a value of 56.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000200 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000302

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000302

58.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 58.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 58.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000302 has a value of 58.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000302 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000303

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000303

69.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 69.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 69.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000303 has a value of 69.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000303 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000304

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000304

58.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 58.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 58.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000304 has a value of 58.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000304 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000400

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000400

70.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000400 has a value of 70.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000500

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000500

55.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000500 has a value of 55.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000600

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000600

61.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 61.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 61.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000600 has a value of 61.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000701

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000701

61.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 61.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 61.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000701 has a value of 61.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000701 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000702

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000702

55.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 55.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 55.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000702 has a value of 55.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000702 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000800

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000800

40.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 40.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 40.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000800 has a value of 40.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000800 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000901

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000901

83.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 83.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 83.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000901 has a value of 83.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000902

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000902

59.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 59.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 59.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000902 has a value of 59.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000902 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000903

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000903

60.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 60.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 60.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000903 has a value of 60.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000903 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001001

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001001

44.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 44.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 44.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001001 has a value of 44.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001001 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001002

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001002

47.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 47.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 47.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001002 has a value of 47.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001002 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001101

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001101

41.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 41.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 41.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001101 has a value of 41.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001101 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001102

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001102

70.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001102 has a value of 70.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001102 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001201

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001201

60.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 60.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 60.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001201 has a value of 60.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001202

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001202

32.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001202 has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001202 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001204

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001204

63.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 63.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 63.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001204 has a value of 63.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001204 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001206

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001206

82.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 82.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 82.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001206 has a value of 82.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001206 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001301

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001301

55.9%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 55.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 55.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001301 has a value of 55.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001301 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001302

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001302

39.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 39.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 39.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001302 has a value of 39.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001302 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001303

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001303

56.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 56.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 56.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001303 has a value of 56.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001304

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001304

37.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001304 has a value of 37.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001401

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001401

68.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 68.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 68.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001401 has a value of 68.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001401 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001402

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001402

46.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001402 has a value of 46.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001402 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001502

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001502

63.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 63.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 63.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001502 has a value of 63.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001502 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001503

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001503

64.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 64.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 64.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001503 has a value of 64.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001503 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)